Cyber Resilience Act

CE marking

Legal definition Art. 3(31) CRA

“a marking by which a manufacturer indicates that a product with digital elements and the processes put in place by the manufacturer are in conformity with the essential cybersecurity requirements set out in Annex I and other applicable Union harmonisation legislation providing for its affixing”
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 3(31) CRA

CE marking is not a quality seal and not a test mark. It is a declaration, and one the manufacturer makes itself. By affixing it, the manufacturer says: this product and the processes I have put in place meet the essential cybersecurity requirements in Annex I and all other applicable Union harmonisation legislation providing for its affixing.

The second half is notable. The declaration expressly covers not only the product but the manufacturer’s processes. Vulnerability handling is therefore part of what the marking asserts, not just the state of the shipped code.

What has to come first

The marking sits at the end of a chain, not the start:

  1. Conformity assessment verifies that the Annex I requirements are met.
  2. The technical documentation records what that verification rests on.
  3. The EU declaration of conformity formally states the result.
  4. Only then is the CE marking affixed.

Treating the marking as a formality at the end reverses the order and usually leaves nothing to back it up.

Affixing it

As a rule the marking is affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly to the product. Where the nature of the product does not allow or does not warrant that, the marking goes on the packaging and on the EU declaration of conformity accompanying the product.

For software there is the special rule already mentioned: the declaration of conformity, or the accompanying website, in the latter case easily and directly accessible. The Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) also allows the height of the mark to be lower than the usual five millimetres where the nature of the product warrants it, provided the marking remains visible and legible.

What hangs on it

With the marking, the manufacturer takes responsibility for the accuracy of its declaration. Market surveillance authorities can request the underlying documentation; where the declaration turns out to be wrong, measures up to recall and withdrawal from the market are on the table.

That is the real reason marking without solid documentation is a risk: it is a commitment that must remain verifiable at any time. That holds for at least ten years, or for the duration of the support period, whichever is longer.

Practical questions

This glossary is for orientation and does not constitute legal advice. The wording of Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 prevails.